Every year, numerous Bangladeshis embark on journeys abroad with hopes of securing a better future. However, before their voyage commences, they are confronted with significant challenges. Forced to pay hefty sums in installments just to pursue their dreams, many families are compelled to sell their properties.
Research indicates that recruitment agencies demand fees far exceeding the government's stipulated amount for sending workers abroad. Additionally, the hard-earned money of these workers often fails to legally return to the country, resulting in significant revenue losses for the government. Allegations suggest the involvement of a syndicate of recruitment agencies in this exploitative process.
Stakeholders in the manpower sector describe it as a lucrative business, where agencies eagerly send workers abroad, even without confirming their employment status.
According to the Bureau of Manpower, Employment, and Training (BMET), the government offers opportunities for workers to migrate to three countries on a government-to-government basis. However, the fees charged by recruiting agencies exceed the government's rates substantially.
For instance, the cost for sending workers to Malaysia, as set by the government, is Tk78,990, but some agencies charge around Tk1.15 lakh per worker. Moreover, demand letters issued to recruiting agencies through lotteries are often sold to others, further inflating costs. This exploitative practice, coupled with the eagerness of Bangladeshi workers to migrate abroad, creates a lucrative opportunity for agencies.
Despite measures taken by the government, such as granting permission to select agencies, the problem persists. Workers continue to face exploitation and endure hardships abroad, as exemplified by the experiences of migrants like Israfil Ali and Shahriar Hossain.
The unethical practices prevalent in the immigration process exacerbate the plight of Bangladeshi workers in various countries. Addressing these issues is imperative to safeguard the welfare of migrant workers in the long run.
Comment: