BRASILIA, Sept 22, V7N - The Brazilian Supreme Court requested that the social media platform X, owned by Elon Musk, provide documentation to validate its newly appointed legal representative in Brazil. This request comes as X's lawyers have indicated the platform's intention to comply with court orders that would allow it to resume operations in the country.
Background of the Shutdown.

X was suspended in Brazil in late August after failing to adhere to court orders regarding the moderation of hate speech on its platform. The court had previously mandated that X appoint a legal representative in Brazil, a requirement for foreign companies operating in the country. Following a protracted dispute between Musk and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, X closed its offices and terminated its staff in Brazil.

The court has mandated that X pay fines surpassing $3 million, block certain accounts connected to a misinformation and hate speech inquiry, and choose a legal counsel. After initially opposing these orders and calling them "illegal," X has now declared that it will pay the financial penalties and has started to ban the designated accounts, while specifics about these accounts are still being kept under wraps because of the ongoing investigation.

In addition to appointing a legal representative, the court has required X to block certain accounts linked to a hate speech and misinformation investigation and to pay fines exceeding $3 million. Initially, X had resisted these orders, labeling them as "illegal," but it has since stated that it will comply with the financial penalties and has begun blocking the specified accounts, although details about these accounts remain confidential due to the nature of the investigation.

Despite the ban, some users in Brazil were able to access X for a limited time following an update that circumvented the court's restrictions. The situation remains fluid as X navigates its legal obligations in Brazil while attempting to restore its operations.
As the platform works to meet the court's demands, the outcome of this legal battle could set important precedents for how social media companies operate in compliance with local laws in foreign markets.

END/BUS/RH/